20-09-2020, 11:54 AM
(20-09-2020, 11:21 AM)ozzyten10 Wrote: I get that but they employed him, surely remit should have been agreed at the outset. I merely perceive that all is not as rosy in the running of the club that some would have us believe...
The backing of Sabri - while commendable is also not consistent with previous decisions either- Karanka sacked after being top half and having encouraging performances / style... O’Neil sacked after finishing relatively strongly in the league. The form of last 10 games is the poorest under this regime yet seemingly backed to the hilt. I hope that this is just hangover and transitioning new players into the squad but no goals in 3 games and very poor defending doesn’t bode well. Perhaps it is just the change curve whereas you get a dip before sustainable gains in performance. We may go on to become a very strong side that gets stronger as the season progresses and perform well at the business end of the season. I really hope that is the case but sadly I can’t see it and have seen a steep decline with no signs of improvement. The second 45 could be argued as a sign of improvement but I’m not buying that- Cardiff allowed us that.
Surely we don't want to consistently make bad decisions?! An improvement in the transfer strategy and long term management strategy is only a positive. Weird comment.
One decision shouldn't inform the next, the O'Neil appointment was a mistake and he was clearly unable/unwilling to work within a model that he surely was aware of at least in principle when joining.