COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM
Ange - Printable Version

+- COYR NOTTINGHAM FOREST FORUM (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: NOTTINGHAM FOREST - A REBEL CLUB IN A REBEL CITY (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Nottingham Forest Down Memory Lane (https://coyrforestforum.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Ange (/showthread.php?tid=1706)



RE: Ange - inside right - 06-10-2025

After their previous dismal season Spurs are now high flying - 3rd in the league. How do you explain that transformation ?


RE: Ange - BomberBowyer - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 10:41 AM)inside right Wrote: After their previous dismal season Spurs are now high flying - 3rd in the league. How do you explain that transformation ?

Seen on facebook that an emergency meeting been called. Not hit the press yet but expected to shortly.


RE: Ange - wassy04 - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 09:50 AM)Salvatore Matrecano Wrote: Are we going to boo the next poor sap out of a job too when he doesn’t win for a few games?
I say this because there is no stand out candidate who is realistic (assuming we can’t get Silva).

So we end up with Dyche/Streich/Martins etc and there is a section of our fans like you lot who don’t agree, does this pattern repeat when we can’t accept that we aren’t as good as we would like to think?

This is my fear too as the new guy is likely going to be someone that is also not someone we'd ideally want. Is the reaction to Ange just a one off because of the disappointment/anger of the Nuno fallout? If it's someone random that most don't know will that give them more time? Part of the Ange issue is just that Spurs were so bad last year and then we've seen identical issues here so far.

Had we have come out swinging those first few games, taken our chances vs Swansea, Burnley, Betis then I imagine everyone would've warmed to Ange more. It really has gone as badly as it could possibly have really.


RE: Ange - ac_vodka - 06-10-2025

I think it's a combination of multiple things but mainly for me the transition to a completely different style of football and also I was big on Nuno's values of togetherness and strength. I just don't see that on display with Ange. I was against his appointment but wanted to give him time to turn things around but just not seeing that and he looks checked out to me already Really not a great situation for anyone but we have to do what is best for the club ( which I do not know the answer to )


RE: Ange - Paplane - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 12:01 PM)ac_vodka Wrote: I think it's a combination of multiple things but mainly for me the transition to a completely different style of football and also I was big on Nuno's values of togetherness and strength. I just don't see that on display with Ange. I was against his appointment but wanted to give him time to turn things around but just not seeing that and he looks checked out to me already Really not a great situation for anyone but we have to do what is best for the club ( which I do not know the answer to )

Yep, totally agree.

Ange is unlucky in that he's been handed a really difficult situation by EM (lots of fixtures/new players etc). Another top level experienced coach coming in might have taken stock, gone with a more cautious approach and not tinkered with much in the short term. But its easy to say that now. With a little more luck he might have got a couple of wins and Wassy is right, he would be ok, but that's water under the bridge now. He hasn't had the luck, he hasn't got the wins and us fans and most of the media can't see where the next one is coming from. On that basis, as unfortunate as it is, he's now a dead man walking and his tenure with us is in an unrecoverable position. As far as I'm concerned he had one last chance to get a win yesterday and he didn't manage to do it. I expect us to have a new manager come the Chelsea game.


RE: Ange - wassy04 - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 12:26 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:01 PM)ac_vodka Wrote: I think it's a combination of multiple things but mainly for me the transition to a completely different style of football and also I was big on Nuno's values of togetherness and strength. I just don't see that on display with Ange. I was against his appointment but wanted to give him time to turn things around but just not seeing that and he looks checked out to me already Really not a great situation for anyone but we have to do what is best for the club ( which I do not know the answer to )

Yep, totally agree.

Ange is unlucky in that he's been handed a really difficult situation by EM (lots of fixtures/new players etc). Another top level experienced coach coming in might have taken stock, gone with a more cautious approach and not tinkered with much in the short term. But its easy to say that now. With a little more luck he might have got a couple of wins and Wassy is right, he would be ok, but that's water under the bridge now. He hasn't had the luck, he hasn't got the wins and us fans and most of the media can't see where the next one is coming from. On that basis, as unfortunate as it is, he's now a dead man walking and his tenure with us is in an unrecoverable position. As far as I'm concerned he had one last chance to get a win yesterday and he didn't manage to do it. I expect us to have a new manager come the Chelsea game.

What happens if we don't win the first 7 games under the new manager? Will we have to change again? It's a pretty dangerous precedent to set.

I think I'd let him do the next few games until the fixtures turn again and give the new manager the easier start. Who knows, maybe we randomly crush someone and go on a run. Last season was bad at Spurs but the first season he did take them back into the top 4 despite finishing mid table year before and losing Kane. Last season's issues were more about the self inflicted injuries which we haven't even got to yet here!

That said he's hardly looked like he has any idea what to do with the team. Playing 3 at the back yesterday after that so clearly didn't work on Thursday and having never used that tactic previously seems pretty questionable. 

He found something first half against Betis and then after Luiz went off he changed it and never went back, why? Savona and Morato having to play is not a good enough reason to abandon all structure in my opinion.


RE: Ange - Paplane - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 12:50 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:26 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:01 PM)ac_vodka Wrote: I think it's a combination of multiple things but mainly for me the transition to a completely different style of football and also I was big on Nuno's values of togetherness and strength. I just don't see that on display with Ange. I was against his appointment but wanted to give him time to turn things around but just not seeing that and he looks checked out to me already Really not a great situation for anyone but we have to do what is best for the club ( which I do not know the answer to )

Yep, totally agree.

Ange is unlucky in that he's been handed a really difficult situation by EM (lots of fixtures/new players etc). Another top level experienced coach coming in might have taken stock, gone with a more cautious approach and not tinkered with much in the short term. But its easy to say that now. With a little more luck he might have got a couple of wins and Wassy is right, he would be ok, but that's water under the bridge now. He hasn't had the luck, he hasn't got the wins and us fans and most of the media can't see where the next one is coming from. On that basis, as unfortunate as it is, he's now a dead man walking and his tenure with us is in an unrecoverable position. As far as I'm concerned he had one last chance to get a win yesterday and he didn't manage to do it. I expect us to have a new manager come the Chelsea game.

What happens if we don't win the first 7 games under the new manager? Will we have to change again? It's a pretty dangerous precedent to set.

I think I'd let him do the next few games until the fixtures turn again and give the new manager the easier start. Who knows, maybe we randomly crush someone and go on a run. Last season was bad at Spurs but the first season he did take them back into the top 4 despite finishing mid table year before and losing Kane. Last season's issues were more about the self inflicted injuries which we haven't even got to yet here!

That said he's hardly looked like he has any idea what to do with the team. Playing 3 at the back yesterday after that so clearly didn't work on Thursday and having never used that tactic previously seems pretty questionable. 

He found something first half against Betis and then after Luiz went off he changed it and never went back, why? Savona and Morato having to play is not a good enough reason to abandon all structure in my opinion.

That's it Wassy. He doesn't seem to have made any progress in the 7 games and he's still scratching around trying to find a foundation from which to build from. He can't carry on like that as he's run out of road.  I changed my mind about him in just 45 minutes last Thursday. Before that I was willing to give him time and I could see positives. But he changed the formation and the team, again. He and everyone knew that Midtjylland were a big team and good at set plays. And yet the first goal we conceded was a carbon copy of the goal we let in just 4 days earlier versus Sunderland. What were they working on all week? 

I blame EM as much as I blame Ange. When he came in Ange was still surrounded by negativity from last season. That, and the complete contrast in playing styles should have been enough for EM to go for someone else.


RE: Ange - wassy04 - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 01:11 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:50 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:26 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:01 PM)ac_vodka Wrote: I think it's a combination of multiple things but mainly for me the transition to a completely different style of football and also I was big on Nuno's values of togetherness and strength. I just don't see that on display with Ange. I was against his appointment but wanted to give him time to turn things around but just not seeing that and he looks checked out to me already Really not a great situation for anyone but we have to do what is best for the club ( which I do not know the answer to )

Yep, totally agree.

Ange is unlucky in that he's been handed a really difficult situation by EM (lots of fixtures/new players etc). Another top level experienced coach coming in might have taken stock, gone with a more cautious approach and not tinkered with much in the short term. But its easy to say that now. With a little more luck he might have got a couple of wins and Wassy is right, he would be ok, but that's water under the bridge now. He hasn't had the luck, he hasn't got the wins and us fans and most of the media can't see where the next one is coming from. On that basis, as unfortunate as it is, he's now a dead man walking and his tenure with us is in an unrecoverable position. As far as I'm concerned he had one last chance to get a win yesterday and he didn't manage to do it. I expect us to have a new manager come the Chelsea game.

What happens if we don't win the first 7 games under the new manager? Will we have to change again? It's a pretty dangerous precedent to set.

I think I'd let him do the next few games until the fixtures turn again and give the new manager the easier start. Who knows, maybe we randomly crush someone and go on a run. Last season was bad at Spurs but the first season he did take them back into the top 4 despite finishing mid table year before and losing Kane. Last season's issues were more about the self inflicted injuries which we haven't even got to yet here!

That said he's hardly looked like he has any idea what to do with the team. Playing 3 at the back yesterday after that so clearly didn't work on Thursday and having never used that tactic previously seems pretty questionable. 

He found something first half against Betis and then after Luiz went off he changed it and never went back, why? Savona and Morato having to play is not a good enough reason to abandon all structure in my opinion.

That's it Wassy. He doesn't seem to have made any progress in the 7 games and he's still scratching around trying to find a foundation from which to build from. He can't carry on like that as he's run out of road.  I changed my mind about him in just 45 minutes last Thursday. Before that I was willing to give him time and I could see positives. But he changed the formation and the team, again. He and everyone knew that Midtjylland were a big team and good at set plays. And yet the first goal we conceded was a carbon copy of the goal we let in just 4 days earlier versus Sunderland. What were they working on all week? 

I blame EM as much as I blame Ange. When he came in Ange was still surrounded by negativity from last season. That, and the complete contrast in playing styles should have been enough for EM to go for someone else.

Oh yeah it was always a strange appointment. 

I guess its more that, that part is done. So whatever you do now will have an impact, if you change him we get a bad reputation and set a dangerous precedent. If you stick, you're keeping a guy that is clearly not up to it and clearly isn't going to last.


RE: Ange - DeesideRed - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 01:34 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 01:11 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:50 PM)wassy04 Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:26 PM)Paplane Wrote:
(06-10-2025, 12:01 PM)ac_vodka Wrote: I think it's a combination of multiple things but mainly for me the transition to a completely different style of football and also I was big on Nuno's values of togetherness and strength. I just don't see that on display with Ange. I was against his appointment but wanted to give him time to turn things around but just not seeing that and he looks checked out to me already Really not a great situation for anyone but we have to do what is best for the club ( which I do not know the answer to )

Yep, totally agree.

Ange is unlucky in that he's been handed a really difficult situation by EM (lots of fixtures/new players etc). Another top level experienced coach coming in might have taken stock, gone with a more cautious approach and not tinkered with much in the short term. But its easy to say that now. With a little more luck he might have got a couple of wins and Wassy is right, he would be ok, but that's water under the bridge now. He hasn't had the luck, he hasn't got the wins and us fans and most of the media can't see where the next one is coming from. On that basis, as unfortunate as it is, he's now a dead man walking and his tenure with us is in an unrecoverable position. As far as I'm concerned he had one last chance to get a win yesterday and he didn't manage to do it. I expect us to have a new manager come the Chelsea game.

What happens if we don't win the first 7 games under the new manager? Will we have to change again? It's a pretty dangerous precedent to set.

I think I'd let him do the next few games until the fixtures turn again and give the new manager the easier start. Who knows, maybe we randomly crush someone and go on a run. Last season was bad at Spurs but the first season he did take them back into the top 4 despite finishing mid table year before and losing Kane. Last season's issues were more about the self inflicted injuries which we haven't even got to yet here!

That said he's hardly looked like he has any idea what to do with the team. Playing 3 at the back yesterday after that so clearly didn't work on Thursday and having never used that tactic previously seems pretty questionable. 

He found something first half against Betis and then after Luiz went off he changed it and never went back, why? Savona and Morato having to play is not a good enough reason to abandon all structure in my opinion.

That's it Wassy. He doesn't seem to have made any progress in the 7 games and he's still scratching around trying to find a foundation from which to build from. He can't carry on like that as he's run out of road.  I changed my mind about him in just 45 minutes last Thursday. Before that I was willing to give him time and I could see positives. But he changed the formation and the team, again. He and everyone knew that Midtjylland were a big team and good at set plays. And yet the first goal we conceded was a carbon copy of the goal we let in just 4 days earlier versus Sunderland. What were they working on all week? 

I blame EM as much as I blame Ange. When he came in Ange was still surrounded by negativity from last season. That, and the complete contrast in playing styles should have been enough for EM to go for someone else.

Oh yeah it was always a strange appointment. 

I guess its more that, that part is done. So whatever you do now will have an impact, if you change him we get a bad reputation and set a dangerous precedent. If you stick, you're keeping a guy that is clearly not up to it and clearly isn't going to last.

I think the change has to come and revert back to an approach of stay in the league and see how far solidity and shape gets us in Europe. 

Those old enough to remember 1995 saw how being hard to beat got us to a european quarter final.


RE: Ange - DR Forest - 06-10-2025

If we don’t seize the opportunity now and wait for more games to pass, the season may be gone.
Then we really would be left with Dyche etc as the choices.

However, in that scenario (and that scenario alone), Dyche might not be the worst option- as long as he understood it was just to steady the ship until the summer when a new guy comes in (like Silva at the end of his contract).

That said, I’m hoping for decisive action and a better calibre of manager.
As sniff suggests, advertise the job.

Maybe Edu can repair some of this mess by pulling a superstar coach out of the hat.


RE: Ange - Paplane - 06-10-2025

(06-10-2025, 02:16 PM)DR Forest Wrote: If we don’t seize the opportunity now and wait for more games to pass, the season may be gone.
Then we really would be left with Dyche etc as the choices.

However, in that scenario (and that scenario alone), Dyche might not be the worst option- as long as he understood it was just to steady the ship until the summer when a new guy comes in (like Silva at the end of his contract).

That said, I’m hoping for decisive action and a better calibre of manager.
As sniff suggests, advertise the job.

Maybe Edu can repair some of this mess by pulling a superstar coach out of the hat.

Edu's not really been talked about much on this forum. 

I know he used to be a good player for the Arse, but who the f is he now and how exactly is he qualified to come into our club and see off the most successful manager we've had in a generation? Arsenal fans may love the guy but in my world he's a nobody.


RE: Ange - Salvatore Matrecano - 06-10-2025

Really torn on this. I don’t want to hound out a new manager without giving him a chance and it reflects very badly on the club if we do. Don’t forget lets hypothetically say Glasner is available (he isn’t) he will be looking at Sky Sports thinking Stuff that Im not going there they want my head on a plate if they don’t win their 2nd home game. We know there was more to the situation but a quick read of all national media simply says “Marinakis sacked Nuno after he took Forest to Europe”. We don’t look an attractive proposition.

But then again as above I just dont see him coming back from this, he managed a more pragmatic approach yesterday but even if he keeps that I don’t see the system working. I would give him the 6 games until the international break but it does seem futile.